I believe in their cause but let’s be honest: that’s shouting at the clouds. Nothing prevents someone who trains IA to use your “restricted” content and then simply pretend they didn’t. Since training transform the data retained, there isn’t a way to “scan” the IA model and check if it contains your “restricted” content.
In short: good luck. You need plenty of it.
kellencs on
0 chance
BusBoatBuey on
Japanese VAs are easily the least under threat by AI. The article implies that the group takes issue with the company also listed, but the two are not directly related. This is going after individuals on YouTube and Japanese digital sale sites that are putting out works with AI.
Stopping them from making AI content is like stopping people in the olden days from recording TV shows and selling them as bootlegs. Very low barrier to entry and high effort to prosecute if made explicitly illegal.
Holmesee on
Good luck and give ’em hell.
Art (in general) being gutted by AI needs to stop.
We might not have great solutions now but these are important steps that help acknowledge and retain the recognition creators deserve that AI is stealing from. These industries have struggled to be fairly recognised and now having AI looking to essentially eat them is gross.
theshinycelebi on
Good, generative AI has zero place in creative mediums.
Ao3y on
What the others have said here about it being inevitable no matter what people say is true. Shouting at the clouds, trying to get people to not record TV on their VHS back in the day… It’s all over guys. As if unlawful agents won’t flaunt every government’s ban on ai doing this.
Can people start having realistic conversations about the future of this tech and how it’s going to rapidly and dramatically change so, so much of society? Now THAT’S a conversation we should have!
6 Comments
I believe in their cause but let’s be honest: that’s shouting at the clouds. Nothing prevents someone who trains IA to use your “restricted” content and then simply pretend they didn’t. Since training transform the data retained, there isn’t a way to “scan” the IA model and check if it contains your “restricted” content.
In short: good luck. You need plenty of it.
0 chance
Japanese VAs are easily the least under threat by AI. The article implies that the group takes issue with the company also listed, but the two are not directly related. This is going after individuals on YouTube and Japanese digital sale sites that are putting out works with AI.
Stopping them from making AI content is like stopping people in the olden days from recording TV shows and selling them as bootlegs. Very low barrier to entry and high effort to prosecute if made explicitly illegal.
Good luck and give ’em hell.
Art (in general) being gutted by AI needs to stop.
We might not have great solutions now but these are important steps that help acknowledge and retain the recognition creators deserve that AI is stealing from. These industries have struggled to be fairly recognised and now having AI looking to essentially eat them is gross.
Good, generative AI has zero place in creative mediums.
What the others have said here about it being inevitable no matter what people say is true. Shouting at the clouds, trying to get people to not record TV on their VHS back in the day… It’s all over guys. As if unlawful agents won’t flaunt every government’s ban on ai doing this.
Can people start having realistic conversations about the future of this tech and how it’s going to rapidly and dramatically change so, so much of society? Now THAT’S a conversation we should have!